Intelligent Design
Intelligent Design - a threat to science teaching
Most scientists who are religious look for God in what science does understand and has explained. So the way in which my view is different from the creationists or intelligent design proponents is that I find knowledge a compelling reason to believe in God. They find ignorance a compelling reason to believe in God.
Kenneth R. Miller
The Intelligent Designer
Discovery Institute intelligent design campaigns
ID is dead, Does intelligent design prove the existence of God?
Tribulations of intelligent design book, Intelligent Design in politics
Timeline of Intelligent Design @ wikipedia
Intelligent design in the UK, is ID science or religion?
Center for Intelligent Design (Glasgow)
How to spot a hidden religious agenda - Censored at New Scientist
History of intelligent design, Secular advocates of ID
Intelligent design movement dead on college campuses
Deborah Owens Fink
Life in the Big Tent - Paul Nelson - Ann Gauger - David L Abel
Intelligent falling - Overview of Expelled - Do ID theorists generate data?
2 Hour Nova special - Judgment Day - (Kitzmiller vs. Dover Area School Board) - see it now online
Nature reviews Judgement Day - Intelligent deception
Guillermo Gonzalez denied tenure - Fringe science - Politicized scholars
ID = creationism - Defeating intelligent design - Judge Jones reflects on Dover
Waging war on evolution - A smart battle against intelligent design
Conclusions of Allen MacNeill's ID course (Cornell) - Wingnut on ID
ID and reductionism - Intelligent design in politics - The Pope weighs in
The conspiracy against intelligent design - ID at Sourcewatch
Eden and evolution, The icon of ID - The Discovery Institute petition - Petition signatories
View from the Vatican - ID in California - Paul Gross, why ID fails - Chickens
Is ID testable? - ID offers biblical alternative - Pseudoscience hurts legitimate study
19th century ID, the bad designer
ID losing favor, Ten errors of ID
A Christian biologist speaks - The 98 pound weakling - ID at wikipedia
In the American Scientist - Atlanta Journal Constitution on "teaching the controversy" - From mpls
Don't teach ID (Chronicle), Progress in ID, Complex specified misinformation
Krugman - NYT, Why ID isn't science, John Calvert - ID's buldog
Intelligent design (ID), the new vitalism, Unintelligent design
Time magazine - A Stealth Attack on Evolution, Leon Wieseltier
Intelligent design as Batesian mimicry, Review by Forrest and Branch in Academe
Excellent review by Mark Terry (Phi Delta Kappan), New! Progress in ID
Can someone explain this ID theory?, DI thinks evolution is a theory in crisis
Dover PA - where the action is, Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, Paul Gross on dealing with ID
A summary of creationism in Nebraska, Kansas, ID as a new paradigm
Marshall Berman's editorial in The American Biology Teacher
Texas textbooks - Dallas Morning News - 7/10/03, Final vote, 11/9 Texas Citizens for Science, A less temperate view.
Texans for Better Science Education, textbook hearings, Report San Antonio, 9/10/03
Intelligent design video productions (with links to religion)
ID is a load of Dingo Kidneys (Pigliucci). Dembski's explanatory filter
Paul Gross finds some minor difficulties with ID (pdf)
ID in the scientific literature - Resource - Anti-evolution in science literature
Discovery Institute page, Should ID be taught in schools? - AAAS policy on ID
Dembski on Intelligent Design - Read especially the last few pages. Specified information seems a legitimate concept, but is it scientifically useful? To become scientific it must be experimentally tested and provide useful insights. "Complex specified information " is poorly defined and clearly not a scientific concept. The " Law of conservation of information" is a hypothesis contradicted by existing data (e.g. the immune system).
Colleges that teach ID - are these our future leading scientific institutions?
Michael Behe's home page - his research interest is stupid (information poor) DNA
Intelligent Design Network - A regional (Kansas) organization that proselytizes intelligent design apologetics. Note the balance on the front page with design and evolution showing equal weight - does this reflect scientific literature?
The wedge strategy for overthrowing modern science. An interview of Phillip Johnson.
Book review - Phillip Johnson's The Wedge of Truth
Book review - 'Intelligent Design Creationism and Its Critics'
Santorum amendment - the amendment never passed! - it was opposed by every major science organization.
How to get bad scientific advice - a weakness of fundamentalism and the legal profession
Talkdesign - talkorigins explores ID
Intelligent design is an integral part of this religion. They support teaching ID.
The Ohio problem - Science Excellence for All Ohioans - markets ID apologetics
Ohio ID survey, Discussion of ID in Physics Today
A Skeptical view, Clay Naff's Journal Star editorial
National Center for Science Education - a good resource.